Potrillos Bros. v. Miranda Produce, Inc. et al
Potrillos Bros. |
Miranda Produce, Inc., Alejandra Mendez and Ernesto Miranda |
5:2024cv01404 |
July 5, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Sheri Pym |
Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
Agriculture Acts |
07 U.S.C. ยง 499 Agricultural Commodities Act |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 11, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
![]() |
Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendants Alejandra Mendez, Ernesto Miranda, Miranda Produce, Inc. (ghap) |
Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Potrillos Bros.. (Chaudhry, Vikrant) |
Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Potrillos Bros., identifying Potrillos Bros; Miranda Produce, Inc.; Alejandra Mendez; Ernesto Miranda. (Chaudhry, Vikrant) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Potrillos Bros.. (Chaudhry, Vikrant) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37783889 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Potrillos Bros.. (Attorney Vikrant Chaudhry added to party Potrillos Bros.(pty:pla))(Chaudhry, Vikrant) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.