Daeshuan Thomas v. Health Market Advisors, Inc. et al
| Daeshaun Thomas |
| Health Market Advisors, Inc. and Does 1-10 Inclusive |
| 5:2024cv01448 |
| July 12, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Jesus G Bernal |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA) |
| 47 U.S.C. ยง 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Health Market Advisors, Inc. (et) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (et) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Jesus G. Bernal and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (et) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by Plaintiff Daeshaun Thomas. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Daeshaun Thomas, identifying Health Market Advisors, Inc.. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Daeshaun Thomas. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37818622 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Daeshaun Thomas. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Daeshaun Thomas(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
