Joe Becerra v. FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. et al
| Joe Becerra |
| FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. and Does 1 through 50, inclusive |
| 5:2024cv01600 |
| July 30, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Sheri Pym |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Employment Discrimination |
| Both |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 23, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 17 STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge (Jaurigue, Michael) |
Filing 16
ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 2 by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Case ordered to Court Mediation Panel for mediation. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 6/26/25. (bm)
|
|
Filing 15
CIVIL TRIAL SCHEDULING ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: Last Day to Stipulate or File Motion to Amend Pleadings or Add New Parties: 11/14/2024; Fact Discovery Cut-Off (including hearing of discovery motions): 3/27/2025; Last Day to Serve Initial Expert Reports: 4/10/2025; Last Day to Serve Rebuttal Expert Reports: 4/24/2025; Expert Discovery Cut-Off (including hearing of discovery motions): 5/15/2025; Motion Hearing Cut-Off: 6/26/2025; Last Day to Conduct Settlement Proceedings: 6/26/2025; Final Pretrial Conference: 8/14/2025 at 10:30 a.m.; Jury Trial: 9/8/2025 at 8:30 a.m. This case is set for trial before the Honorable Kenly Kiya Kato, 3470 12th Street, 3rd Floor, Courtroom 3, Riverside, CA 92501. (see document for further details) (bm)
|
|
Filing 14
NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: Pursuant to the Court's Order Setting Scheduling Conference, the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report was required to include a statement indicating counsel discussed the magistrate judge consent program with their client, and the parties met and conferred to discuss the consent program. However, the parties' Joint Rule 26(f) Report failed to include such a statement. See dkt. 12. Hence, no later than ten days from the date of this Order, the parties shall submit a statement indicating (1) defense counsel has discussed the magistrate judge consent program with their client, (2) Plaintiff and defense counsel have met and conferred to discuss the consent program and selection of a magistrate judge, and (3) whether the parties consent to have a magistrate judge preside over the matter for all purposes. Failure to timely comply with this Order may result in sanctions, including dismissal for failure to prosecute and comply with Court orders and/or monetary sanctions. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
|
Filing 13
SCHEDULING NOTICE AND ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato: The Scheduling Conference set for 9/26/2024, is hereby VACATED. The Court will issue a separate trial scheduling order setting forth a trial schedule. IT IS SO ORDERED. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (npo) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
|
| Filing 12 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5 days, filed by Plaintiff Joe Becerra.. (Shahabi, S) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Scheduling Conference set for 9/26/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (npo)
|
|
Filing 10
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (npo)
|
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Shasha H. Kewalramani to Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:24-cv-01600 KK(SPx). (rn) |
| Filing 8 SUPPLEMENT to Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.. (Flynn, Jane) |
| Filing 7 DECLINED STATEMENT OF CONSENT TO PROCEED before the assigned Magistrate Judge filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.. (Flynn, Jane) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C) (lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF ANSWER to Complaint, filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. (FILED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 7/18/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 )(lh) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Does, FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. Jury Demanded, filed by Plaintiff Joe Becerra. (FILED IN RIVERSIDE COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT ON 6/21/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED TO NOTICE OF REMOVAL #1 ) (lh) |
| Filing 5 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc. identifying FedEx Corporation as Corporate Parent. (Flynn, Jane) |
| Filing 4 Notice filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.. Notice of No Related Cases and No Pendency of Other Actions (Flynn, Jane) |
| Filing 3 Certification of Interested Entities or Persons NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc., identifying FedEx Corporation. (Flynn, Jane) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.. (Flynn, Jane) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside County Superior Court, case number CVRI2403505 with filing fee previously paid (405 paid on 07/30/2024, receipt number ACACDC-37928939), filed by Defendant FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Declaration Jane Flynn, #2 Declaration Shahram Eslami, #3 Declaration Kerri Martinez) (Attorney Jane M. Flynn added to party FedEx Supply Chain, Inc.(pty:dft))(Flynn, Jane) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
