Monster Energy Company v. Theater Monster LLC
| Monster Energy Company |
| Theater Monster LLC |
| 5:2024cv01694 |
| August 9, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Sheri Pym |
| Sunshine Suzanne Sykes |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act) |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 21, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 13 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 attachment) (twdb) |
| Filing 12 NOTICE of Voluntary Dismissal filed by plaintiff Monster Energy Company. Dismissal is without prejudice. (Zadra-Symes, Lynda) |
Filing 11
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes. (iva)
|
| Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff Monster Energy Company, upon Defendant Theater Monster LLC served on 8/13/2024, answer due 9/3/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Nathan Goldstein, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 9 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Theater Monster LLC. (ghap) |
| Filing 8 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (ghap) |
| Filing 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (ghap) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 filed by plaintiff Monster Energy Company. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 4 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Monster Energy Company. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Monster Energy Company, identifying Monster Beverage Corporation, parent corporation; The Coca-Cola Company, Shareholder owning approximately 16.7% of common stock of Monster Beverage Corporation. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Monster Energy Company. (Mayer, Hans) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-37998376 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Monster Energy Company. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-8) (Attorney Hans Linden Mayer added to party Monster Energy Company(pty:pla))(Mayer, Hans) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Monster Energy Company v. Theater Monster LLC | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Monster Energy Company | |
| Represented By: | Steven J Nataupsky |
| Represented By: | Lynda J Zadra-Symes |
| Represented By: | Hans Linden Mayer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Theater Monster LLC | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
