John Y. Lwin et al v. Merrick B. Garland et al
John Y. Lwin and Josephine L. Lwin |
Alejandro Mayorkas, Loren K. Miller, Ur M. Jaddou and Merrick B. Garland |
5:2024cv01746 |
August 15, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Fernando L Aenlle-Rocha |
David T Bristow |
Other Immigration Actions |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 3, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 14 MOTION FOR VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL OF WRIT OF MANDAMUS ; NOTICE I-130 APPROVED AND UNDERLYING ISSUE RESOLVED; REQUEST THE COURT GRANT THIS MOTION AND DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE filed by plaintiffs John Y. Lwin, Josephine L. Lwin (lc) |
Filing 13 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Y. Lwin, Josephine L. Lwin, upon Defendant Ur M. Jaddou served on 8/26/2024, answer due 10/25/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, By certified mail return receipt NOT attached only Postage paid receipt, cites USPS tracking number 9589 0710 5270 1399 3478 58. (lc) |
Filing 12 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Y. Lwin, Josephine L. Lwin, upon Defendant Merrick B. Garland served on 8/26/2024, answer due 10/25/2024.Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, By certified mail return receipt NOT attached only Postage paid receipt, cites USPS tracking number 9589 0710 5270 1399 3478 34.(lc) |
Filing 11 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Y. Lwin, Josephine L. Lwin, upon Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas served on 8/26/2024, answer due 10/25/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, By certified mail return receipt NOT attached only Postage paid receipt, cites USPS tracking number 9589 0710 5270 1399 3478 41. (lc) |
Filing 10 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff John Y. Lwin, Josephine L. Lwin, upon Defendant Loren K. Miller served on 8/22/2024, answer due 10/21/2024. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed executed in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, By certified mail return receipt NOT attached only Postage paid receipt, cites USPS tracking number 9589 0710 5270 1399 3478 65. (lc) |
Filing 9 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (car) |
Filing 8 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (car) |
Filing 7 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Merrick B. Garland. (car) |
Filing 6 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Alejandro Mayorkas. (car) Modified on 8/20/2024 (car). |
Filing 5 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Ur M. Jaddou. (car) |
Filing 4 60 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), #1 as to Defendant Loren K. Miller. (car) |
Filing 3 APPLICATION for Pro Se Litigant to electronically file documents in a specific case filed by plaintiff Josephine L. Lwin. (car) |
Filing 2 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff John Y. Lwin, Josephine L. Lwin (car) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendants Case assigned to Judge Fernando L. Aenlle-Rocha for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow.(Filing fee $ 405 PAID), filed by plaintiffs John Y. Lwin, Josephine L. Lwin. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (car) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.