Laura Chavaria Gomez v. Martin J. O'Malley
Laura CHAVIRA Gomez |
Martin J. OMalley |
5:2024cv01777 |
August 20, 2024 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David T Bristow |
Social Security: SSID Tit. XIV |
42 U.S.C. ยง 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID) |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on October 18, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 11 STIPULATION to Dismiss Case pursuant to past filing deadline filed by Plaintiff Laura Chavira Gomez. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Gerrard, Josephine) |
Filing 10 NOTICE TO COUNSEL: ALL PARTIES having consented to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge, this case has been reassigned to Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow for all further proceedings. Please use the case number 5:24-cv-01777 DTB on all documents subsequently filed to ensure the proper routing of all filings. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. TEXT ONLY ENTRY. (rn) |
Filing 9 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Plaintiff Laura Chavira Gomez. (Gerrard, Josephine) |
Filing 8 CONSENT TO PROCEED before Magistrate Judge, in accordance with Title 28 Section 636(c) and F.R.CIV.P 73(b), filed by Defendant Martin J. OMalley. (Attorney Jennifer Tarn added to party Martin J. OMalley(pty:dft))(Tarn, Jennifer) |
Filing 7 MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) Order re: Procedures in Social Security Appeals by Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. Defendant must file and serve an Answer no later than October 21, 2024. (see document for further details) (hr) |
Filing 6 ORDER by Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes: Granting #4 REQUEST to Proceed in Forma Pauperis (NON-PRISONER CASE). (twdb) |
Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Sunshine Suzanne Sykes and referred to Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. (sh) |
Filing 4 REQUEST to Proceed In Forma Pauperis, Declaration in Support filed by Plaintiff Laura CHAVIRA Gomez. (Gerrard, Josephine) |
Filing 3 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Laura CHAVIRA Gomez, (Gerrard, Josephine) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant Commissioner of Social Security. (Gerrard, Josephine) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT with In Forma Pauperis request, filed by Plaintiff Laura CHAVIRA Gomez. (Attorney Josephine Mary Gerrard added to party Laura CHAVIRA Gomez(pty:bkmov))(Gerrard, Josephine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Laura Chavaria Gomez v. Martin J. O'Malley | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Martin J. OMalley | |
Represented By: | Jennifer Tarn |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA |
Represented By: | Assistant US Attorney LA-CV |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Laura CHAVIRA Gomez | |
Represented By: | Josephine Mary Gerrard |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.