C.M. v. Costco Wholesale Corporation et al
| C. M. |
| Does 1 to 25, inclusive and Costco Wholesale Corportion |
| 5:2024cv02133 |
| October 7, 2024 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| David T Bristow |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| P.I.: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Personal Injury |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 5, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 19
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO LIMIT PLAINTIFF, C.M.'S DAMAGES by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Following review of the Joint Stipulation to Limit Plaintiff's Damages, Plaintiff's agreement to limit his damages to $74,999.99, and good cause having been shown, the case is REMANDED to the Riverside County Superior Court, Case No.: CVRI2400842. (Case Terminated. Made JS-6.) (aco)
|
| Filing 18 STIPULATION for Review of LIMIT PLAINTIFF,C.M.S DAMAGES filed by defendant Costco Wholesale Corportion. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION TO LIMIT PLAINTIFF,C.M.S DAMAGES)(Attorney Rinat Klier-Erlich added to party Costco Wholesale Corportion(pty:dft))(Klier-Erlich, Rinat) |
|
Filing 17
ORDER GRANTING CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Following review of the Consent Order Granting Substitution of Attorney, the Substitution of Attorney is hereby approved and so Ordered. (aco)
|
| Filing 16 STIPULATION to Substitute attorney John K. Flock, Esq. in place of attorney John K. Flock, Esq. filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corportion. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING CONSENT ORDER GRANTING SUBSTITUTION OF ATTORNEY)(Flock, John) |
|
Filing 15
ORDER TO STRIKE ELECTRONICALLYFILED DOCUMENT(S) by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. The Court hereby ORDERS the documents listed below be STRICKEN for failure to comply with the Court'sLocal Rules, General Orders, and/or Case Management Order, as indicated: Stipulation to Substitute Attorney #13 , for the following reasons: Proposed order was not submitted. L.R. 52-4.1; L.R. 5-4.4.2. (aco)
|
| Filing 14 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronic Filed Document RE: Stipulation to Substitute Attorney #13 . The following error(s) was/were found: Proposed document was not submitted or was not submitted as a separate attachment. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (aco) |
| Filing 13 [DOCUMENT STRICKEN PER ORDER ON 11/27/2024, SEE DOC NO. 15] STIPULATION to Substitute attorney John K. Flock, Esq. in place of attorney John K. Flock, Esq. filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corportion.(Flock, John) Modified on 11/27/2024 (aco). |
|
Filing 12
ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. Scheduling Conference set for 12/12/2024 at 10:00 AM before Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (npo)
|
|
Filing 11
CIVIL STANDING ORDER by Judge Kenly Kiya Kato. (npo)
|
| Filing 10 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) |
| Filing 9 NOTICE OF REASSIGNMENT of MJDAP case from Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym to Judge Kenly Kiya Kato for all further proceedings. Any discovery matters that may be referred to a Magistrate Judge are assigned to U.S. Magistrate Judge David T. Bristow. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judges 5:24-cv-02133-KK (DTBx). (et) |
|
Filing 8
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER #7 by Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. See document for details. (es)
|
| Filing 7 STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corportion.(Flock, John) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Attorney Case Opening RE: Notice of Removal (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 . The following error(s) was found: It appears the name of an individual known to be a minor is contained in documents filed with the Court. Fed R Civ P 5.2(a) requires that a minor's initials (as opposed to a minor's spell-out name) be used on documents filed with this Court, unless the Court orders otherwise. You are not required to take any action in response to this notice unless the Court so directs. (ghap) |
| Filing 5 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery) filed by Defendant Costco Wholesale Corportion.(Flock, John) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE TO COUNSEL re Magistrate Judge Direct Assignment Program. This case has been randomly assigned to Magistrate Judge Sheri Pym. (Attachments: #1 CV-11C Statenent of Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge) (ghap) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION, identifying Courtney Martin, a minor by and through her guardian ad litem, Tangya Martin; Costco Wholesale Corporation. (Flock, John) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (Flock, John) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE OF REMOVAL from Riverside Superior Court, case number CVRI2400842 Receipt No: ACACDC-38350463 - Fee: $405, filed by Defendant COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION. (Attorney John K Flock added to party COSTCO WHOLESALE CORPORATION(pty:dft))(Flock, John) |
| CONFORMED FILED COPY OF COMPLAINT against Defendants Costco Wholesale Corporation, Does 1 to 25, Inclusive., filed by plaintiff C. M. (FILED IN STATE COPY ON 2/13/2024 SUBMITTED ATTACHED EXHIBIT A) (ghap) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
