Novo Nordisk A/S et al v. De Luz Medical Aesthetics Inc.
| Novo Nordisk A/S and Novo Nordisk Inc. |
| De Luz Medical Aesthetics Inc. |
| 5:2024cv02386 |
| November 8, 2024 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1051 Trademark Infringement |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 8, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by plaintiff Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc., identifying Novo Nordisk A/S. (Djoukeng, Francoise) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), #1 filed by plaintiff Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc.. (Djoukeng, Francoise) |
| Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc.. (Djoukeng, Francoise) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiffs Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc.. (Djoukeng, Francoise) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-38554097 - Fee: $405, filed by plaintiff Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo Nordisk Inc.. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A) (Attorney Francoise N. Djoukeng added to party Novo Nordisk A/S(pty:pla), Attorney Francoise N. Djoukeng added to party Novo Nordisk Inc.(pty:pla))(Djoukeng, Francoise) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
