Jeremy Scott v. Disney Platform Distribution, Inc. et al
| Jeremy Scott |
| Disney Platform Distribution, Inc. and Does 1-10 |
| 5:2025cv00638 |
| March 11, 2025 |
| U.S. District Court for the Central District of California |
| Kenly Kiya Kato |
| Shashi H Kewalramani |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 11, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 as to Defendant Disney Platform Distribution, Inc.. (sh) |
| Filing 7 Notice to Counsel Re Consent to Proceed Before a United States Magistrate Judge. (sh) |
| Filing 6 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (sh) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Kenly Kiya Kato and Magistrate Judge Shashi H. Kewalramani. (sh) |
| Filing 4 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) #1 , Certificate/Notice of Interested Parties #3 , Civil Cover Sheet (CV-71) #2 filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Scott. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Scott, (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Scott. (Friedman, Todd) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT Receipt No: ACACDC-39269864 - Fee: $405, filed by Plaintiff Jeremy Scott. (Attorney Todd M Friedman added to party Jeremy Scott(pty:pla))(Friedman, Todd) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
