Ormco Corporation v. Align Technology Inc
Case Number: 8:2003cv00016
Filed: December 8, 2006
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Unassigned
Nature of Suit: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1331 CONSENT JUDGMENT by Judge Christina A. Snyder: IT IS ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED this Court has personal jurisdiction over the parties and the subject matter of this action, including the enforcement of the Settlement Agreement. Pursuant to the te rms and conditions of the Settlement Agreement entered between Ormco and Align, the issues of damages, willfulness and attorneys' fees as they relate to Ormco's allegations of infringement of its patents have been fully settled and all rema ining allegations that were made or could have been made by Ormco in Case No. SACV 03-16 CAS (ANx) are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Ormco's pending Motion for a Permanent Injunction 1261 is hereby denied as moot. All defenses and counter claims that were made or could have been made by Align in Case No. SACV 03-16 CAS (ANx) are hereby dismissed with prejudice. Except as set forth in the Parties' Settlement Agreement, each party shall bear its own costs and attorneys' fees. ( MD JS-6. Case Terminated ) (mg)
August 3, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1283 MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court DENIES Align's Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law 1241 . Court Reporter: Sandra Becerra. (gk)
July 27, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1278 FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW signed by Judge Christina A. Snyder. The Court finds that judgment should be entered in favor of Ormco on Aligns claims for prosecution laches and unclean hands. (pp)
March 18, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1101 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) by Judge Christina A. Snyder: Proceedings: DENYING Ormco's EX PARTE APPLICATION to Clarify or, in the Alternative, Reconsider a Portion of the Order Denying Align's Motion to Exclude Opinions of Drs. Roberts and Hall and Denying Ormco's Motion to Strike Richard Ferraro and Align's Definition of a Person of Ordinary Skill in the Art 1080 . (mg)
February 23, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 1077 ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART ORMCO'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NO INEQUITABLE CONDUCT 962 by Judge Christina A. Snyder: The Court GRANTS summary judgment to Plaintiff Ormco Corp. on the issue of (1) alleged misconduct in acq uiring and reissuing the '405 patent and (2) failure to disclose the '405 reissue and related documents during the '444 patent prosecution. The Court DENIES summary judgment on the issue of failure to disclose the Scott declaration during the '444 patent prosecution. (gk)
October 3, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 933 MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER Construing Claims 37, 38, 45 and 69 of the '444 Patent held before Judge Christina A. Snyder. For the reasons contained in this order, the Court determines that the proper construction of "landmark parameters&q uot; in claim 38 is "locations on the tooth used to derive attributes of the tooth for modeling tooth movement." Furthermore, the Court concludes that the term "data" as used in claims 37, 45, and 69 is properly construed as " ;three dimensional data from two or more teeth that is undifferentiated in the sense that the data points are not identified as data associated with a particular tooth." Furthermore, the terms "shape" or "shapes" of tooth or teeth as used in claims 37, 45, and 69 is properly construed as "'shape' or 'shapes' in three dimensions." The term "data thereof" as used in claims 37 and 45 should be construed as "data in three dimensio ns of the three-dimensional surfaces that have the shapes of multiple teeth." Finally, the terms "representation" of or "represent" as used in claims 37, 45, and 69 is also limited to "representation in threedimensions." (csi)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Ormco Corporation v. Align Technology Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?