USA v. Samuel J DeAngelo, et al
| USA |
| Kelly David, Samuel J DeAngelo, Alan M Hovey, Joe Gordon Shields, Western Tax Services Inc and Jeffrey R Wright |
| 8:2003cv00251 |
| October 6, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Marc L. Goldman |
| Andrew J. Guilford |
| Taxes |
| 26 U.S.C. ยง 7401 IRS: Tax Liability |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
108
JUDGMENT PERMANENTLY ENJOINING DEFENDNATS DeANGELO AND DAVID FROM ENGAGING IN CERTAIN CONDUCT SUBJECT TO INCOME TAX RETURN PREPARER PENALTY UNDER I.R.C. SECTION 6694 filed by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court having granted the United States' motion for summary judgment 85 against the remaining defendants, Samuel J. DeAngelo and Kelly A. David to permanently enjoin them from engaging in certain conduct subject to tax return preparer, it is accordingly, hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECR EED, that purusant to I.R.C. Section 7407(b) and I.R.C. Section 7402(a), the Remaining Defendants, along with any agents, servants, employees, attorney, or other persons, in active concert or participation with them...The parties hereto shall bear their respective costs, including any possible attorneys' fees or other expenses of this litigation. (See document for further details) (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
