Janet E. Kelly v. Michael J. Astrue

Janet E. Kelly v. Michael J. Astrue

Plaintiff:	Janet E Kelly
Defendant:	Michael J Astrue
Case Number:	8:2007cv00757
Filed:	June 28, 2007
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
County:	Orange
Presiding Judge:	George H Wu
Presiding Judge:	Jacqueline Chooljian
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
September 16, 2008	Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. On July 11, 2007, plaintiff Janet E. Kelly (plaintiff) filed a Complaint seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Securitys denial of plaintiffs application for benefits. The parties ha ve filed a consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties cross motions for summary judgment, respectively (Plaintiffs Motion) and (Defendants Motion). The Court has taken both motions under submission without oral argument. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Commissioner of SocialSecurity is affirmed. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (es)

Date Filed

Document Text

September 16, 2008

Filing 20 MEMORANDUM OPINION by Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Chooljian. On July 11, 2007, plaintiff Janet E. Kelly (plaintiff) filed a Complaint seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Securitys denial of plaintiffs application for benefits. The parties ha ve filed a consent to proceed before a United States Magistrate Judge. This matter is before the Court on the parties cross motions for summary judgment, respectively (Plaintiffs Motion) and (Defendants Motion). The Court has taken both motions under submission without oral argument. For the foregoing reasons, the decision of the Commissioner of SocialSecurity is affirmed. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. (SEE ATTACHED ORDER FOR FURTHER DETAILS) (es)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Janet E. Kelly v. Michael J. Astrue
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Michael J Astrue
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney LA-SSA
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Janet E Kelly
Represented By:	Bill LaTour
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?