Churchill Leadership et al v. Longstaffe et al
Plaintiff: Churchill Leadership
Defendant: Does 1-10, Inclusive, Integratis, Christopher Longstaffe and The Sales Solution
Case Number: 8:2007cv00814
Filed: July 13, 2007
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
County: San Francisco
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge: Unassigned - CIV
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 5, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 42 REVISED JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED by this Court that judgment be and hereby is entered for Counterplaintiffs Christopher Longstaffe, The Sales Solution, Inc. and Integratis, Ltd. against Counterd efendants CLI and CLL that: 1. Christopher Longstaffe is awarded and recovers from CLI and CLL the amount of $387,000.00 for nonpayment of wages owed plus $93,071.77 in prejudgment interest for a total sum of $480,071.77. 2. Pursuant C alifornia Civil Procedure Code § 685.010, post-judgment interest will be applied at the daily rate of rate of 0.027397% for nonleap years and 0.027322% for leap years from the date of entry of this judgment below, January 4, 2009. 3. C hristopher Longstaffe is awarded and recovers from CLI and CLL reasonable attorneys' fees, as a prevailing party in an action for nonpayment of wages, in the amount of $11,340.00 pursuant to California Labor Code § 218.5; (See document for further details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla) Modified on 1/13/2009 (rla).
September 18, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 25 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. The Court orders Counter Claimant to show cause in writing no later than 09/26/08 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. (See minute order for further details) (db)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Churchill Leadership et al v. Longstaffe et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Churchill Leadership
Represented By: Jennifer Sun
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Does 1-10, Inclusive
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Integratis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Christopher Longstaffe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: The Sales Solution
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?