Islamic Chura Council of Southern California et al v. Federal Bureau of Investigation et al
| Islamic Chura Council of Southern California, Council on American Islamic Relations - California, Islamic Center of San Gabriel Valley, Islamic Center of Hawthorne, West Coast Islamic Center, Human Assistance and Development International, Inc, Muzammil Siddiqi, Shakeel Syed, Hussam Ayloush, Mohammed Abdul Aleem and Rafe Husain |
| Federal Bureau of Investigation and United States Department of Justice |
| 8:2007cv01088 |
| September 18, 2007 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Orange |
| Unassigned |
| Freedom of Information Act |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 552 Right to Privacy Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
JUDGMENT awarding plaintiffs reasonable attorneys fees in the amount of $36,248 by Judge Cormac J. Carney, Related to: REQUEST for Judgment 137 . (twdb)
|
|
Filing
136
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS AN AWARD OF REASONABLE ATTORNEYS FEES IN THE AMOUNT OF $36,248 (See document for details.) Court GRANTS Plaintiffs an award of attorneys' fees as to the lodestar figure of $21,505 for Mr. Arulanantham, $7,125 for Ms. Sawaf, and $7,618 for Ms. Moran. The Government shall pay Plaintiffs a total of $36,248 in reasonable attorneys' fees. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
