D & D Group Pty Ltd et al v. Jaysons Group
| D & D Technologies (USA) Inc, D & D Technologies Pty Ltd and D & D Group Pty Ltd |
| Jaysons Group |
| 8:2008cv00767 |
| July 11, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Orange |
| Carter |
| Nakazato |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter, WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: Court Orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than APRIL 25, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted dilige ntly: PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF A MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, OR REQUEST TO THE CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. (rla)
|
|
Filing
18
IN CHAMBERS -ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter, WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: Court orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than AUGUST 25, 2010, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted dilige ntly. Defendants answer to complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default.No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all parties who have not yet appeared in this action. (rla)
|
|
Filing
13
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution held before Judge David O. Carter. Written Response due 02/26/2010. (See Order for details) (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
