Joshua Rashid Radwan et al v. County of Orange et al
| Joshua Rashid Radwan |
| Michael Carona, County of Orange, DOES, Ira Essoe, Cyril Foster, James Fouste, Manuel Garcia, Mark Hergesheimer, David Hernandez, Sean Hilliard, Mark Kunar, Jarrett Kurimay, Michael Padilla, -, Matthew Prince and Thomas Streeter |
| Attorney Settlement Officer |
| 8:2008cv00786 |
| August 18, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Andrew J. Guilford |
| Arthur Nakazato |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
249
JUDGMENT by Judge Andrew J. Guilford, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED AS FOLLOWS: That judgment shall be entered in favor of Defendants County of Orange, Michael Carona, James Fouste, Matthew Prince, Mark Kunar, Mark Hergesheimer, Michael Padilla, Manuel Garcia, Cyril Foster, David Hernandez, and Jarrett Kurimay and against the Plaintiff Joshua Rashid Radwan on all claims. Any costs and attorneys fees as the Court may deem to be recoverable will be reserved and determined by the Court at a further hearing. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
|
|
Filing
151
ORDER (1) Granting in Part and Denying in Part Individual Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment 52 ; (2) Granting County's Motion for Summary Judgment 54 by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. (See Order for details) (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
