Sekisui Ta Industries LLC v. Sewing Collection Inc et al
| Sekisui Ta Industries LLC |
| Sewing Collection Inc, A Xuong Thread Corporation, Houshang Tour, Touraj Tour, DOES and Minh Mien Ma |
| 8:2008cv00909 |
| August 13, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Orange |
| Guilford |
| Nakazato |
| Trademark |
| 15 U.S.C. ยง 1114 Trademark Infringement |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
MINUTES OF IN CHAMBERS ORDER by Judge Andrew J. Guilford: ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: The Court, on its own motion, hereby ORDERS Plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than December 1, 2008 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by Plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: (See document for further details.) Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(m) The Court may dismiss the action prior to the expiration of such time, however, if plaintiff(s) has/have not diligently prosecuted the action. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
