Jerome Brown v. Ben Curry
Petitioner: Jerome Brown
Respondent: Ben Curry
Case Number: 8:2008cv01087
Filed: September 30, 2008
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
County: Monterey
Presiding Judge: Chapman
Presiding Judge: Stotler
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 2, 2008 Opinion or Order Filing 4 JUDGMENT by Chief Judge Alicemarie H. Stotler: Pursuant to the Opinion and Order on a Petition for Habeas Corpus 3 , IT IS ADJUDGED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus is SUMMARILY DISMISSED for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (pcl)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jerome Brown v. Ben Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jerome Brown
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Ben Curry
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?