Perciballi et al v. Ng et al
| Deborah Perciballi and Louis Nieto Jr |
| Henry L Ng, Samir Chachoua, Gilbert Burciaga, Jeunesse Institute, Thomas Kabisch, Nathan Kabisch, Alexandra April and Does 1 through 50 Inclusive |
| 8:2008cv01168 |
| October 17, 2008 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Orange |
| Nakazato |
| Selna |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Other Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
191
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO PROSECUTE by Judge James V. Selna. On September 14, 2016, the Court DIRECTED Plaintiff's Counsel to file a Status Report in this matter not later than S eptember 26, 2016. As of today the Court has not received a the requested status report. The Court hereby orders the plaintiff to show cause (OSC), in writing, not later than October 19, 2016, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. The Court will consider filing of the indicated status report, on or before October 19, 2016 as an appropriate response to this OSC. (dro)
|
|
Filing
160
ORDER RE COERCIVE CONTEMPT SANCTIONS by Judge James V. Selna. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND FOUND that: (See document for details.) Kabisch is ordered to show cause in person on March 18, 2013 at 9:00 a.m. in Courtroom 10C, 411 W. 4th Street, Santa Ana, California why the Court should not issue a warrant for his arrest and incarceration until he complies with the Court's Orders to give his deposition in this matter. Any written response to this Order to Show Cause shall be filed no later than March 11, 2013. Proof of service of this Order shall be filed not later than March 11, 2013. (rla)
|
|
Filing
94
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution by Judge James V. Selna. The Court ORDERS plaintiff(s), to show cause in writing no later than April 22, 2010 why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution as to the defendants. (See Order for details) (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
