Tim Belczak et al v. James Shute et al
Tim Belczak, Joe Shaheen, David Shaheen, Jerry Sandler, Jerry Kronquist, Jim Doyle, Jeff Miller and Frank Kirby |
James Shute and Patricia Shute |
8:2009cv00305 |
March 11, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
Orange |
Guilford |
Nakazato |
Racketeer/Corrupt Organization |
18 U.S.C. ยง 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 JUDGMENT in Favor of Defendants Patricia Shute and James Shute by Judge Andrew J. Guilford. THEREFORE, IT IS HERBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Judgment is hereby entered in favor of the Shutes and against plaintiffs Tim Belczak, Joe and David Shaheen, Jerry Sandler, Jerry Kronquist, Jim Doyle, Jeff Miller and Frank Kirby; IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that, pursuant to Local Rule 54-2.2, the Shutes are the prevailing parties. The Shutes (or either of them) shall file a separate Bill of Costs within fifteen (15) days after entry of this Judgment in accordance with the Local Rules. (db) |
Filing 33 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Granting Defendants' Motion for Judgmenton the Pleadings by Judge Andrew J. Guilford 24 . Defendants Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings is GRANTED without leave to amend. Defendants may submit a brief, concise proposed judgment to the Court within 14 days of this Order. (See Order for further details) (MD JS-6) (db) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.