Freeman Decorating Services Inc v. Action Pursuit Group et al
| Freeman Decorating Services Inc |
| Cary Floyd, Digital Age Motorsports LLC, Does and Action Pursuit Group, LLC |
| 8:2009cv00445 |
| April 9, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| XX US, Outside California |
| Block |
| Carter |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
70
ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE IN RE CONTEMPT by Judge David O. Carter Show Cause Hearing set for 7/18/2011 08:30 AM before Judge David O. Carter. (twdb)
|
|
Filing
59
APPLICATION AND ORDER for Appearance and Examination (Enforcement of Judgment) filed by Plaintiff Freeman Decorating Services Inc as to Defendant Digital Age Motorsports LLC. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. Judgment Debtor Exam set for 12/14/2010 09:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block. (nbo)
|
|
Filing
56
JUDGMENT AGAINST DIGITAL AGE MOTORSPORTS, LLC by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Freeman Decorating Services Inc against Digital Age Motorsports LLC in the principal amount of $45,000, interest in the amount of $0.0, attorneys fees of $0.0, costs of $0.0 for a total judgment of $45,000. Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 54 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
