Lifelock Inc v. Pathway Data Inc
Plaintiff: Lifelock Inc
Defendant: Pathway Data Inc
Case Number: 8:2009cv00640
Filed: June 2, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
County: XX US, Outside California
Presiding Judge: Carter
Presiding Judge: Nakazato
Nature of Suit: Trademark
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 25, 2010 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER RE DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE by Judge David O. Carter. Upon stipulation, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that all claims and counterclaims be dismissed with prejudice. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (db)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lifelock Inc v. Pathway Data Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lifelock Inc
Represented By: R Eric Gaum
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pathway Data Inc
Represented By: Howard J Klein
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?