Kathy Kim v. Michael J Astrue
Kathy Kim |
Michael J Astrue |
8:2009cv00735 |
June 26, 2009 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
Orange |
Zarefsky |
Zarefsky |
Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1383 Review of HHS Decision |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 17 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Ralph Zarefsky. Fees awarded to Plaintiff's counsel, as Plaintiff's assignee in the amount of $3,300.00. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 16 . (ib) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Kathy Kim v. Michael J Astrue | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Michael J Astrue | |
Represented By: | Joanna E Kang |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Kathy Kim | |
Represented By: | Bill LaTour |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.