Edgar Mejia Hernandez v. Robert F Haws
Petitioner: Edgar Mejia Hernandez
Respondent: Robert F Haws
Case Number: 8:2009cv00742
Filed: June 29, 2009
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Office: Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
County: Los Angeles
Presiding Judge: Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Turchin
Nature of Suit: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 13, 2009 Opinion or Order Filing 20 JUDGMENT DENYING AND DISMISSING THIS ACTION WITH PREJUDICE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, Related to: R&R Adopting Report and Recommendations 19 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dam)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Edgar Mejia Hernandez v. Robert F Haws
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Robert F Haws
Represented By: Angela M Borzachillo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Edgar Mejia Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?