Budget Blinds Inc v. Sherre Paschal et al
| Budget Blinds Inc |
| Sherre Paschal, Louis Morris and Does |
| 8:2009cv00816 |
| July 15, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Orange |
| Block |
| Carney |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
27
JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in the principal amount of $55352, interest in the amount of $0.0, attorneys fees of $3814.08, costs of $0.0 for a total judgment of $59166.08. (rla)
|
|
Filing
11
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Judge Cormac J. Carney. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT PENDING TRIAL on Budget Blinds claims, Defendants Sherre Paschal and Louis Morris and their officers, directors, agents, servants, employees, and attorneys, and those in act ive concert or participation with them, ARE HEREBY ENJOINED from (1) using Budget Blinds intellectual property, including all service marks, trademarks, trade names, and trade dress of Budget Blinds, and (2) operating a window coverings business with in the previously franchised territory in Florida that is more specifically described in Schedule A to the Franchise Agreement dated June 12, 2007. This preliminary injunction shall be effective upon the posting by Budget Blinds of an undertaking or bond in the sum of $5,000. (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
