Ramon Pineda et al v. Richard Howard et al
| Ramon Pineda and Parmanand Kumar |
| Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, Schroeder Management Company, Jim Parker, William Ring, James R Graham, Richard Dorsey, Does 1 to 50, Inclusive and Richard Howard |
| 8:2009cv00880 |
| July 31, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Orange |
| Eick |
| Selna |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal - Fraud |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna on Motion for Summary Judgment as to Claims of Parmanand Kumar. IT IS ORDERED that Parmanand Kumar take nothing from defendants James R. Graham and Schroeder Management Company, Inc. This action to be dismissed on the merits with respect to the claims of Parmanand Kumar against James R. Graham and Schroeder Management. (nbo)
|
|
Filing
44
(In Chambers) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge James V. Selna: Plaintiffs Ramon Pineda and Parmanand Kumar and their counsel are directed to show cause in writing within ten days why the complaint should not be dismissed and/or sanctions imposed for fail ure to prosecute, including failure to make timely service on Richard Parkhurst, file an amended complaint of behalf of Kumar stating a claim against James R. Graham, and participate in a settlement conference within the deadline established by the Court's Scheduling Order. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
