Robert M Forester v. Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency et al
| Robert M Forester |
| The Educational Resources Institute, Does 1-5 and Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency |
| 8:2009cv00930 |
| August 11, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Orange |
| Block |
| Goldman |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER of Dismissal of Defendant American Education Services/Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency with Prejudice by Judge David O. Carter. Pursuant to the stipulation for dismissal between Plaintiff Robert M. Forester and American Education Services/Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency, American Education Services/Pennsylvania Higher Education Assistance Agency hereby is dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear his or its own costs and fees. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (db)
|
|
Filing
21
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Motion to Dismiss by Judge David O. Carter 15 . For the foregoing reasons, Defendants Motion is DENIED in part as to the claim for violations of the FCRA and is GRANTED in part with leave to amend as to the violations of Cal. Bus. & Prof. Code § 17200. Plaintiff shall have twenty (20) days to amend the Complaint. (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
