Newport Mesa Unified School District v. R R et al
| Newport Mesa Unified School District |
| DOES 1-10 inclusive, California Department of Education, Orange County Department of Education and R R |
| Orange County Department of Education |
| California Department of Education |
| 8:2009cv00980 |
| August 26, 2009 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Southern Division - Santa Ana Office |
| Orange |
| Goldman |
| Selna |
| Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
80
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, in favor of Newport Mesa Unified School District, Orange County Department of Education, R R against California Department of Education. 5) CDE is ordered to reimburse OCDE in the amount of $30,633.46 for the ed ucational costs that OCDE expended for R.R.'s educational program from March 9, 2007 through December 31, 2008; (See document for further details.) 8) NMUSD, OCDE, and R.R. shall recover their reasonable costs of suit herein as against CDE; 10) This Court retains jurisdiction over the parties to the extent necessary to allow R.R. to obtain prevailing party attorneys fees from CDE pursuant to the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act for purposes of the underlying administrative action and the instant appeal hereof. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
