Alice Daniels v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Alice Daniels v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Alice Daniels v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration

Plaintiff:	Alice Daniels
Defendant:	Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Case Number:	8:2009cv01108
Filed:	September 25, 2009
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Office:	Southern Division - Santa Ana Office
County:	Orange
Presiding Judge:	Morrow
Presiding Judge:	Woehrle
Nature of Suit:	Other
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Jury Demanded By:	Plaintiff

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
December 22, 2010	Filing 20 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, Based upon the parties Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay the amount of THREE THOUSAND S EVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($3,700.00) for attorney fees and NINETEEN DOLLARS and TEN CENTS ($19.10) for costs, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 19 (lmh)
October 1, 2010	Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is remanded to defendant for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Decision and Order. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 17 , Complaint - (Social Security), Complaint - (Social Security) 4 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)

Date Filed

Document Text

December 22, 2010

Filing 20 ORDER AWARDING EAJA FEES by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, Based upon the parties Stipulation for Award and Payment of Equal Access to Justice Act Fees, Costs and Expenses: IT IS ORDERED that the Commissioner shall pay the amount of THREE THOUSAND S EVEN HUNDRED DOLLARS and NO CENTS ($3,700.00) for attorney fees and NINETEEN DOLLARS and TEN CENTS ($19.10) for costs, as authorized by 28 U.S.C. § 2412(d), subject to the terms of the above-referenced Stipulation. Re: Stipulation for Award of EAJA Fees 19 (lmh)

October 1, 2010

Filing 18 JUDGMENT by Magistrate Judge Carla Woehrle, IT IS ADJUDGED that this action is remanded to defendant for further proceedings pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) and consistent with the accompanying Decision and Order. Related to: Memorandum & Opinion, 17 , Complaint - (Social Security), Complaint - (Social Security) 4 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (lmh)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Alice Daniels v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Alice Daniels
Represented By:	Troy Dana Monge
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Represented By:	Assistant US Attorney SA-CV
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?