Fremont Reorganizing Corporation v. National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh et al
| Fremont Reorganizing Corporation |
| National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh, Zurich American Insurance Company and Continental Insurance Company |
| 8:2010cv00310 |
| March 12, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| James V. Selna |
| Insurance |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
233
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, in favor of Continental Insurance Company against Fremont Reorganizing Corporation Related to: Order on Motion for Summary Judgment 225 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that pursuant to the Court's January 5, 2012 order granting Continental's motion for summary judgment on all causes of action asserted against it by Plaintiff and denying Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to all claims against Continental (except declaratory relief which was grante d in part to the extent of the conclusions declared in the January 5, 2012 order) and Rule 54(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds there is no just reason for delay and that judgment is entered in favor of Defendant Continental Insurance Company and against Plaintiff Signature Group Holdings, Inc., successor in interest to Fremont Reorganizing Corporation. As the prevailing party, Continental is entitled to its costs pursuant to Rule 54. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
