Alan J Watson et al v. Blue Diamond Excavation Inc et al
Cash Flow Financial LLC and Alan J Watson |
Blue Diamond Excavation Inc, DOES, William V Ison, Olathe Mining Company Inc and Sundial Investment Group LLC |
8:2010cv00459 |
April 13, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
David O. Carter |
Marc L. Goldman |
Securities/Commodities |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 41 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter: WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: Court orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than APRIL 20, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed as de fendant Sundial Investment Group LLC. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: PLAINTI FFS FILING OF A MOTION FOR ENTRY OF DEFAULT JUDGMENT, OR REQUEST TO THE CLERK TO ENTER DEFAULT JUDGMENT. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. (rla) |
Filing 34 IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter, WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: The file in this case lacks the papers that would show it is being timely prosecuted, as reflected below. Accordingly, the Cour t orders plaintiff(s) to show cause in writing no later than January 10, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed as to all remaining defendants for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will ac cept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Proof of service of the Summons and Complaint as to defendant Sundial Investment Group LLC, etc. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. (rla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.