Catherine L Nazarian v. Chevy Chase Bank FSB et al
| Catherine L Nazarian |
| Capital One N A, Chevy Chase Bank FSB, DOES, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Inc and TD Service Company of Arizona |
| 8:2010cv01246 |
| August 16, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Andrew J. Guilford |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Truth in Lending |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
8
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Andrew J. Guilford Dismissing Case Without Prejudice. On August 31, 2010, this Court issued an order regarding pretrial matters (August 31 Order). The Court ordered Plaintiff, within 14 days, to file a declaration u nder penalty of perjury stating that there had been compliance with Rule 11(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and specifically stating that the allegations supporting federal jurisdiction complied with Rule 11(b).The August 31 Order stated: If the declaration required by paragraph 1 is not timely filed, the Court will assume Plaintiff does not wish to pursue this case at this time in federal court, and to avoid a dismissal with prejudice, this case will be immediately dismissed WITHOUTPREJUDICE. (August 31 Order at 1-2.)Plaintiff has not filed the declaration required by the August 31 Order. Accordingly, this Case is DISMISSSED without Prejudice. All pending dates are ordered VACATED. Terminated. Made JS-6. (db)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
