Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v. Royal Pacific Funding Corporation
Plaintiff: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc
Defendant: Royal Pacific Funding Corporation
Case Number: 8:2010cv01871
Filed: December 8, 2010
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: John E. McDermott
Presiding Judge: James V. Selna
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 27, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 61 ORDER OF DISMISSAL UPON SETTLEMENT OF CASE by Judge James V. Selna. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc v. Royal Pacific Funding Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Royal Pacific Funding Corporation
Represented By: Randall Kirk Johnson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Lehman Brothers Holdings Inc
Represented By: Marisa B Hudson-Arney
Represented By: Michael A Rollin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?