US Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. American Bullion Exchange Abex Corp et al
| US Commodity Futures Trading Commission |
| R E Lloyd Commodities Group Holding LLC, Ryan A Nassbridges, Bita J Nassbridges, American Preferred Commodities APC Corp, American Bullion Exchange Abex Corp and American Bullion Exchange LLC |
| 8:2010cv01876 |
| December 8, 2010 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| David O. Carter |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
297
FINAL JUDGMENT and Order of Permanent Injunction, Civil Monetary Penalty and Other Equitable Relief Against Defendants and Relief Defendants by Judge David O. Carter, Related to: Notice of Lodging 296 . (see document for details). (dro)
|
|
Filing
278
ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting in Part Motion for Summary Judgment 257 269 (mt)
|
|
Filing
146
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: granting 138 Motion to Strike Defendants Motion of Defective Service, RE MOTION 132 and document is stricken. Accordingly, the hearings set for July 16, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. and July 30, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. are removed from the calendar. (twdb)
|
|
Filing
143
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: striking 129 Motion to Vacate ; granting 133 Motion to Strike and document is stricken. Accordingly, the hearings set for July 9, 2012 at 8:30 a.m. and July 23, 2012 at 8:30 a.m.are removed from the calendar. (twdb)
|
|
Filing
120
IN CHAMBERS - ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter, WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: Court orders plaintiff (s) to show cause in writing no later than June 4, 2012, why this action should not be dismissed as to defendants American Bullion Exchange Abex, Corp., American Bullion Exchange, LLC, American Preferred Commodities APC, and R E Lloyd Commodities Group Holding LLC for lack of prosecution. As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before the above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendants' answer to complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Defaul t. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order will stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all parties who have not yet appeared in this action. (rla)
|
|
Filing
90
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: Granting 81 Motion to Set Aside Default Re: Clerks Entry of Default (CV-37) 80 . Denying the Nassbridges' Motion to Reconsider Application for Court to Appoint an Attorney 85 . (See document for further details.) Defendants shall file a responsive pleading on or before November 14, 2011. (rla) Modified on 10/18/2011 (rla).
|
|
Filing
83
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING 69 Application for Appointment of Counsel: (See document for details.) (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
