Thomas A. Seaman v. Teem LLC et al
Thomas A Seaman |
Anthony Macaluso, Nicole Macaluso, Teem LLC and Does |
8:2010cv01902 |
December 15, 2010 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Robert N. Block |
Cormac J. Carney |
Contract: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 JUDGMENT by Judge David O. Carter, in favor of Thomas A Seaman against Teem LLC, Anthony Macaluso Related to: Stipulation for Judgment, 27 . (see document for details). (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (dro) |
Filing 20 ORDER REGARDING SETTLEMENT PROCEDURES, PRE-TRIAL CONFERENCE AND TRIAL by Judge Cormac J. Carney, The Court's mandatory procedures and requirements for Settlement, the Pre-Trial Conference and Trial are as follows: (See document for details.) (rla) |
Filing 17 (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge Cormac J. Carney: RE DISMISSAL FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: The Court ORDERS plaintiff, to show cause in writing no later than October 31, 2011, why this action should not be dismissed for lack of prosecution. A s an alternative to a written response by plaintiff, the Court will consider the filing of one of the following, as an appropriate response to this OSC, on or before the above date: X Joint Rule 26(f) Report (FRCivP 26); X Stipulation and Order to Dismiss. Absent a showing of good cause, an action shall be dismissed if the summons and complaint have not been served upon all defendants within 120 days after the filing of the complaint. (rla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.