Jennifer Lynn Henderson v. Javier Cavazos, Warden
Petitioner: Jennifer Lynn Henderson
Respondent: Javier Cavazos
Case Number: 8:2011cv00128
Filed: January 24, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Philip S. Gutierrez
Presiding Judge: Ralph Zarefsky
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 2, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 27 JUDGMENT by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Petition is denied and the action dismissed with prejudice. Re: Order Accepting Report and Recommendations 26 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (ib)
January 31, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 2 ORDER SUMMARILY DISMISSING CASE WITHOUT PREJUDICE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (ib)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Jennifer Lynn Henderson v. Javier Cavazos, Warden
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Javier Cavazos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Jennifer Lynn Henderson
Represented By: Fay Arfa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?