Clifford Michael Oliver v. United States of America

Justia Dockets & Filings Ninth Circuit California Central District Clifford Michael Oliver v. United States of America

Clifford Michael Oliver v. United States of America

Petitioner:	Clifford Michael Oliver
Respondent:	United States of America
Case Number:	8:2011cv00170
Filed:	January 28, 2011
Court:	US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge:	David O. Carter
Nature of Suit:	Prisoner: Vacate Sentence

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 31, 2012	Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter Denying Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. For reasons stated in Order, Court DENIES Petitioners Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody WITH PREJUDICE. Additionally, the Court DENIES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (db)
August 15, 2011	Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) 1 . Resolution of Petitioners remaining claim for ineffective assistance of counsel requires further inquiry. The C ourt finds that a limited waiver of the attorney-client privilege, in line with the limitations discussed above, has occurred and ORDERS Respondent to submit a filing setting forth proposedprocedures for implementing the waiver and a proposed briefing schedule for further addressing Petitioners ineffective assistance claim. This filing shall be due no later than September 6, 2011. (twdb)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 31, 2012

Filing 11 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter Denying Petitioner's Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence. For reasons stated in Order, Court DENIES Petitioners Motion to Vacate, Set Aside, or Correct Sentence by a Person in Federal Custody WITH PREJUDICE. Additionally, the Court DENIES to issue a Certificate of Appealability. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (db)

August 15, 2011

Filing 4 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge David O. Carter: DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S Motion to Vacate/Set Aside/Correct Sentence (2255) 1 . Resolution of Petitioners remaining claim for ineffective assistance of counsel requires further inquiry. The C ourt finds that a limited waiver of the attorney-client privilege, in line with the limitations discussed above, has occurred and ORDERS Respondent to submit a filing setting forth proposedprocedures for implementing the waiver and a proposed briefing schedule for further addressing Petitioners ineffective assistance claim. This filing shall be due no later than September 6, 2011. (twdb)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Clifford Michael Oliver v. United States of America
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Respondent: United States of America
Represented By:	Assistant 2241-2255 US Attorney SA-CR
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Petitioner: Clifford Michael Oliver
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?