Allergan USA Inc v. Lee Tempel, M.D.
Plaintiff: Allergan USA Inc
Defendant: Lee Tempel, M.D.
Case Number: 8:2011cv00253
Filed: February 11, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Robert N. Block
Presiding Judge: David O. Carter
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 25, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 14 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: denying 3 Motion to Dismiss Case. The Motion is DENIED. Within twenty (20) days of this Orders filing, the parties areordered to show cause in writing as to why they should not be compelled to arbitrate Allergans claims. (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Allergan USA Inc v. Lee Tempel, M.D.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Lee Tempel, M.D.
Represented By: Eric C Peterson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Allergan USA Inc
Represented By: Adam M Greely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?