U.S. Energy Technologies, Inc. v. Deco Lighting Inc et al
| U.S. Energy Technologies, Inc. |
| Does and Deco Lighting Inc |
| U.S. Energy Technologies, Inc. |
| Deco Lighting Inc |
| 8:2011cv00329 |
| March 1, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| Josephine Staton Tucker |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
51
ORDER OF DISMISSAL by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, re Stipulation to Dismiss 50 : 1. US Light's claims asserted against Deco in the above-referenced action are dismissed with prejudice. 2. Deco's counterclaims asserted against US Light i n the above-referenced action are dismissed with prejudice. Deco may reassert its patent invalidity, noninfringement and unenforceability counterclaims in the event US Light were to initiate future patent litigation against Deco. 3. There shall be no award to any of the Settling Parties of costs, attorneys' fees and/or other expenses of litigation. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rla)
|
|
Filing
49
STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block re Stipulation for Protective Order 48 : IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the following principles and procedures shall govern any and all discovery among the parties and any third parties, as applicable: (See document for details.) (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
