American Induction Technologies Inc v. KBK Inc et al
| American Induction Technologies Inc |
| KBK Inc and Does |
| American Induction Technologies Inc |
| Adaptive Energy Systems Inc |
| 8:2011cv00350 |
| March 3, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Contract: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
282
AMENDED JUDGMENT 281 : Hongyuan to pay KBK its damages and prejudgment interest through the date of entry of this Judgment in a total judgment amount of $5,626,779.41. The total judgment amount shall accrue post-judgment interestpursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1961. Hongyuan's Counterclaims (which were filed on May 1, 2012 as Docket No. 229) are hereby dismissed with prejudice, and Hongyuan shall take nothing from its Counterclaims (See document for further details) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. (ir)
|
|
Filing
41
PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Robert N. Block re Stipulation for Protective Order 40 : The Court, having read and considered the Stipulation re: Protective Order submitted by plaintiff American Induction Technologies, Inc., defendant and third party plaintiff KBK, Inc, and third-party defendant Adaptive Energy Systems, Inc., and good cause appearing therefore, hereby orders as follows:(See Order for details). (wr)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
