Carl N Marschall v. Caine and Weiner Company Inc et al
Carl N Marschall |
LA Peer Surgery Center LLC, Caine and Weiner Company Inc, Caine and Weiner Company LLC and Caine and Weiner South LLC |
8:2011cv00397 |
March 10, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Robert N. Block |
David O. Carter |
Other Statutory Actions |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 29 MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS): ORDER by Judge David O. Carter: granting 12 Motion to Dismiss. For the reasons set forth above, Defendants Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED with leave to amend. Plaintiff shall have 14 days from the date of this order to amend. (twdb) |
Filing 6 IN CHAMBERS ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge David O. Carter WHY THIS CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF PROSECUTION: As an alternative to a written response by plaintiff(s), the Court will accept one of the following, if it is filed on or before t he above date, as evidence that the matter is being prosecuted diligently: Defendant's answer to complaint or Plaintiff's Request for Entry of Default. No oral argument of this matter will be heard unless ordered by the Court. The Order wil l stand submitted upon the filing of a responsive pleading or motion on or before the date upon which a response by plaintiff(s) is due. Plaintiff is to serve notice of this Order on all parties who have not yet appeared in this action. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 4/25/2011. (rla) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.