Marilyn Ellis v. Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada et al
| Marilyn Ellis |
| Sun Life Assurance Company of Canada and Does |
| 8:2011cv00471 |
| March 25, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Victor B. Kenton |
| James V. Selna |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
12
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by Judge James V. Selna, re Failure to File Joint Rule 26 Report and Order Continuing Scheduling Conference: A Scheduling Conference in this matter has been set for July 25, 2011. The Scheduling Conference is ordered off calendar. The Local Rule requires a single, joint report, but the Court only has the defendants' report along with the declaration of Daniel W. Maguire. L.R. 26-1. Marilyn Ellis and her counsel are ordered to show cause at 10:00 a.m. August 8, 2011 why the Court should not strike the complaint for failure to comply with the Local Rules or otherwise sanction plaintiff and/or counsel. A written response is due August 4, 20011. In lieu of a response, the parties may file a joint report wh ich conforms with the Local Rules and the Order setting the Scheduling Conference by the same date. The parties shall include Exhibit A properly completed. The Court will conduct a hearing on this order to show cause at 10:00 a.m. August 8, 2011. If a complying joint report is filed, the Court will convert the hearing into a Scheduling Conference. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
