CSR Technology Inc v. Bandspeed Inc
Plaintiff: CSR Technology Inc
Defendant: Bandspeed Inc
Case Number: 8:2011cv00494
Filed: April 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Marc L Goldman
Referring Judge: Mariana R Pfaelzer
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Both
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on December 11, 2012. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
December 11, 2012 Filing 105 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (Attachments: #1 Order) (lom)
December 3, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 104 ORDER Granting Stipulation to Dismiss #103 by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer.The Court hereby ORDERS that the above-captioned action is dismissed in its entirety, with prejudice as to all claims, answers, defenses, and counterclaims of both parties. Each party to bear its own costs, attorney fees, and expenses. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (lom)
November 9, 2012 Filing 103 Joint STIPULATION to Dismiss Case filed by Defendant Bandspeed, Inc. Bandspeed Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Brian)
November 9, 2012 Filing 102 Joint STIPULATION for Settlement - providing notice of settlement filed by Defendant Bandspeed, Inc. Bandspeed Inc.(Smith, Brian)
October 22, 2012 Filing 101 NOTICE of Settlement and Agreement to Stay Pending Deadlines filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
October 15, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 100 ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: DENYING #76 Defendant Bandspeed Inc's Motion for Summary Judgment. (pj)
September 17, 2012 Filing 99 Notice of Electronic Filing re Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, Status Conference, Terminate Hearings #98 e-mailed to agoel@stblaw.com bounced due to 550 5.7.1 RESOLVER.RST.NotAuthorized; not authorized. The primary e-mail address associated with the attorney record has been deleted. Pursuant to the General Order and Local Rules it is the attorneys obligation to maintain all personal contact information including e-mail address in the CM/ECF system. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(tyw) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
September 17, 2012 Filing 98 MINUTES OF STATUS CONFERENCE (held & completed) before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Court and counsel discuss the motion #76 . The Court takes the motion under submission and its order will follow. Court Reporter: Deborah Gackle. (lom)
September 4, 2012 Filing 97 IN CHAMBER MINUTE ORDER * NOTICE OF CORRECTION * Due to a clerical error by the clerk, the Motion for Summary Judgment #76 , was continued by a Text Only Scheduling Notice, 96 moving the hearing to 09/20/2012 at 11:00 am. THE CORRECT DATE AND TIME FOR THE HEARING IS THE ORIGINAL DATE AND TIME MONDAY, SEPTEMBER 17, 2012 AT 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(cs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
August 31, 2012 Filing 96 IN CHAMBER MINUTE ORDER. The Court on its own motion, continues the Hearing on the Motion for Summary Judgment #76 . The motion was scheduled to be heard on 09/17/2012, at 11:00 AM., and will now be heard on Thursday, 9/20/2012, at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (cs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
August 10, 2012 Filing 95 REPLY in Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Noninfringement of All Asserted Patents #76 filed by Counter Claimant Bandspeed Inc, Defendant Bandspeed Inc. (Attachments: #1 Response to Plaintiffs Genuine Issues of Fact, #2 Declaration of Brian A.E. Smith, #3 Exhibit 1 to Smith Decl., #4 Exhibit 2 to Smith Decl.)(Smith, Brian)
July 25, 2012 Filing 88 NOTICE of Issuance of Subpoena to Dr. Dirk Hartogs filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc. (Smith, Brian)
July 19, 2012 Filing 94 SEALED DOCUMENT- PLAINTIFF CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.'S Partial Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. (mat)
July 19, 2012 Filing 93 SEALED DOCUMENT- EXHIBIT 4 to Declaration of Colman D. McCarthy in Support of Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc.'s Partial Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. (Attachments: Part 2)(mat)
July 19, 2012 Filing 92 SEALED DOCUMENT- PLAINTIFF CSR Technology Inc.'s Statement of Genuine Issues in Partial Opposition to Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. (mat)
July 19, 2012 Filing 91 SEALED DOCUMENT- DECLARATION of Dr. Dirk Hartogs in Support of Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc.'s Partial Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. (Attachments: Part 2, Part 3, Part 4, Part 5, Part 6, Part 7, Part 8, Part 9, Part 10, Part 11, Part 12)(mat)
July 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 90 ORDER GRANTING Application for Leave to File Documents Under Seal in Connection With its Partial Opposition to Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement #89 by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (jp)
July 13, 2012 Filing 89 APPLICATION for Leave to File Documents Under Seal in Connection With its Partial Opposition to Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. Lodged Proposed Order. (jp)
July 13, 2012 Filing 87 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE filed by plaintiff CSR Technology Inc, for documents associated with Plaintiff CSR's Partial Opposition to Defendant Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement, served on July 13, 2012. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
July 13, 2012 Filing 86 DECLARATION of Colman D. McCarthy in Support of Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc.'s Partial Opposition to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
July 13, 2012 Filing 85 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc of documents associated with Plaintiff CSR's Partial Opposition to Defendant Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-Infringement. (Attachments: #1 Attachment A)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
June 27, 2012 Filing 84 NOTICE of Issuance of Subpoena to Dr. Adnan Aziz filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit CSR's Subpoena to Dr. Adnan Aziz)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
June 27, 2012 Filing 83 NOTICE OF LODGING filed [Proposed] Judgment Granting re MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Noninfringement of All Asserted Patents #76 (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order /Judgment)(Smith, Brian)
June 27, 2012 Filing 82 STATEMENT of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law (L.R. 56.1) in Support of MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Noninfringement of All Asserted Patents #76 filed by Counter Claimant Bandspeed Inc, Defendant Bandspeed Inc. (Smith, Brian)
June 26, 2012 Filing 79 SEALED DOCUMENT-EXHIBITS E TO Q to the Declaration of Dr. Adnan Aziz in Support of Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. (Attachments: #1 part 2, #2 part 3, #3 part 4, #4 part 5, #5 part 6)(mg)
June 25, 2012 Filing 78 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey E Ostrow counsel for Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. Adding Patrick E. King as attorney as counsel of record for CSR Technology Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
June 19, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting #80 Application for leave to file under seal confidential exhibits attached to the Declaration of Dr. Adnan Aziz, submitted in support of Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. (lom)
June 18, 2012 Filing 77 Amended NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Bandspeed Inc, Defendant Bandspeed Inc of Application for Leave to File Under Seal; Proposed Order Granting Leave to File Under Seal; Exhibits E-Q to the Declaration of Dr. Aziz (filed under seal). (Smith, Brian)
June 15, 2012 Filing 80 APPLICATION for Leave to File file under seal confidential exhibits attached to the Declaration of Dr. Adnan Aziz, submitted in support of Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc. Lodged [Prop] Order. (lom)
June 15, 2012 Filing 76 NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Noninfringement of All Asserted Patents filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc. Motion set for hearing on 9/17/2012 at 11:00 AM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (Attachments: #1 Appendix 1, #2 Declaration of Dr. Adnan Aziz, #3 Exhibit A to the Declaration of Dr. Aziz, #4 Exhibit B to the Declaration of Dr. Aziz, #5 Exhibit C to the Declaration of Dr. Aziz, #6 Exhibit D to the Declaration of Dr. Aziz)(Smith, Brian)
June 14, 2012 Filing 75 Corrected NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Bandspeed Inc, Defendant Bandspeed Inc of Exhibits E-Q of Declaration of Dr. Aziz in Support of Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Smith, Brian)
June 14, 2012 Filing 74 NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Counter Claimant Bandspeed Inc, Defendant Bandspeed Inc of Exhibits E-Q to the Decl. of Dr. Aziz in Support of Bandspeed's Motion for Summary Judgment of Noninfringement. (Smith, Brian)
June 1, 2012 Filing 73 Letter filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc to The Honorable Mariana R. Pfaelzer Regarding Bandspeed's Letter of May 25, 2012 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A - 4-10-12 Letter A. Goel to B. Smith)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
May 29, 2012 Filing 72 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Brian A E Smith counsel for Counter Claimant Bandspeed Inc, Defendant Bandspeed Inc. Changing Firm Name and Address to Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP, 55 Francisco Street, 6th Floor, San Francisco, CA 94133. Changing email and fax number to bsmith@bdiplaw.com (415) 675-8892. Adding Brian A.E. Smith as attorney as counsel of record for Bandspeed Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc. (Smith, Brian)
May 28, 2012 Filing 71 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Matthew Franklin Greinert counsel for Defendant Bandspeed Inc. Changing Firm Name to Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP. Changing Email to mgreinert@bdiplaw.com. Filed by Defendant Bandspeed, Inc. (Greinert, Matthew)
May 28, 2012 Filing 70 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Henry Charles Bunsow counsel for Defendant Bandspeed Inc. Changing Firm Name to Bunsow, De Mory, Smith & Allison LLP. Changing Email to hbunsow@bdiplaw.com. Filed by Defendant Bandspeed, Inc. (Bunsow, Henry)
May 25, 2012 Filing 69 Letter to Judge Pfaelzer filed by Counter Claimant Bandspeed Inc, Defendant Bandspeed Inc (Smith, Brian)
May 22, 2012 Filing 68 Letter filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc to The Honorable Mariana R. Pfaelzer Regarding the Court's April 4, 2012 Order (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
May 10, 2012 Filing 67 NOTICE of Change of Attorney Information for attorney Jeffrey E Ostrow counsel for Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc.Michelle Woodhouse is no longer attorney of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-06 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 4, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 66 ORDER Granting Stipulation to Reschedule #65 by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. It is hereby Ordered: (1)No later than April 13, 2012, Bandspeed shall produce, for each of the accused products, hardware and software, and make available for inspection source code related to the accused products in accordance with the provisions of the Protective Order in this case; (2) No later than May 4, 2012, CSR shall serve Final Amended Infringement Contentions that comply with the Court's June 30, 2011 Order; (3) The Parties shall complete early written damages and injunctive relief fact discovery, as well as one 30(b)(6) fact deposition on damages per side, no later than May 15, 2012; (4) The Parties shall attend and complete mediation no later than May 25, 2012; (5) Bandspeed shall file any motion for summary judgment of noninfringement no later than June 15, 2012; (6) CSR shall complete the depositions of any declarants in support of Bandspeed's motion for summary judgment no later than June 29, 2012; (7) CSR shall file its opposition to any motion for summary judgment no later than July 13, 2012; and 8) Bandspeed shall complete the depositions of any declarants in support of CSR's opposition to Bandspeeds motion for summary judgment no later than July 31, 2012; and (9) Bandspeed shall file any reply in support of its motion for summary judgment no later than August 10, 2012. (lom)
March 27, 2012 Filing 65 Joint STIPULATION to Reschedule JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING CASE SCHEDULE filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
March 27, 2012 Filing 64 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jeffrey E Ostrow on behalf of Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
March 6, 2012 Filing 63 MINUTES OF Status Conference held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer:The case is called and appearances are made. Court and counsel discuss the status of case. The motion for summary judgment will be filed on or before June 15, 2012. The parties will submit a joint briefing schedule and proposed order to the Court.Court Reporter: Rosalyn Adams. (ys)
March 1, 2012 Filing 60 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan AMENDED JOINT RULE 26(f) REPORT ; estimated length of trial 10 days, filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc.. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
February 21, 2012 Filing 62 MINUTES OF In Chambers Telephonic Conference held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The case is called and appearances are made. Court and counsel discuss the status of case. The Court order a Conference on Tuesday, march 6, 2012 at 11:00 a.m.. The parties will submit a report to the Court on or before March 1, 2012.Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (cs)
February 21, 2012 Filing 61 MINUTES of Telephone Conference in chambers (held and completed) before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Court and counsel discuss the status of the case. The Court sets a Status Conference for Tuesday March 6, 2012 at 11:00 a.m. Counsel are ordered to submit a Status Report on March 1, 2012. Court Reporter: Alex Joko. (lom)
February 16, 2012 Filing 59 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings January 9, 2012 @ 11 a.m. (Valine, Victoria)
February 16, 2012 Filing 58 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on January 9, 2012 @ 11 a.m.. Court Reporter: Victoria L. Valine, CSR, RMR, CRR, phone number www.victoriavalinecsr.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 3/8/2012. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 3/18/2012. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 5/16/2012. (Valine, Victoria)
February 16, 2012 SCHEDULING NOTICE IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer scheduling a Telephone Conference for 2/21/2012 at 2:00 PM before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The clerk will email counsel the "call-in" information. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY.(cs) TEXT ONLY ENTRY
February 7, 2012 Filing 57 Letter filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
January 31, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 56 CLAIM CONSTRUCTION ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Please refer to order for details. (cs)
January 17, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 55 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. (See attached document for details.) (lom)
January 12, 2012 Filing 54 Joint REQUEST for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
January 10, 2012 Filing 52 NOTICE PLAINTIFF CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.'S NOTICE OF FILING OF INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 1-A, #3 Exhibit 1-B, #4 Exhibit 1-C)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
January 9, 2012 Filing 53 MINUTES OF Markman Hearing held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The case is called and appearances are made. Court and counsel discuss the patents and terms at issue. The Court takes the matter under submission and its order will follow.Court Reporter: Victoria Valine. (cs)
December 22, 2011 Filing 51 BRIEF filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. PLAINTIFF CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.'S OPPOSITION CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF ON UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,297,771, 6,757,324, AND 6,933,886 regarding Supplement (non-motion), Supplement (non-motion) #49 . (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
December 22, 2011 Filing 50 MEMORANDUM of Points and Authorities in Support DEFENDANT BANDSPEED, INC.S RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF (Attachments: #1 Declaration Supplemental Declaration of Brian A.E. Smith In Support of Bandspeed's Responsive Claim Construction Brief, #2 Exhibit 15, #3 Exhibit 16, #4 Exhibit 17, #5 Exhibit 18, #6 Exhibit 19, #7 Exhibit 20, #8 Exhibit 21, #9 Exhibit 22)(Smith, Brian)
December 10, 2011 Filing 49 SUPPLEMENT to Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal), Brief (non-motion non-appeal) #46 filed by Counter Claimant Bandspeed Inc, Defendant Bandspeed Inc. (Smith, Brian)
December 9, 2011 Filing 48 DECLARATION of Colman D. McCarthy re Brief (non-motion non-appeal) #47 DECLARATION OF COLMAN D. MCCARTHY IN SUPPORT OF PLAINTIFF CSR'S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF ON UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,297,771, 6,757,324, AND 6,933,886 filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
December 9, 2011 Filing 47 BRIEF filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. PLAINTIFF CSR TECHNOLOGY INC.'S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF ON UNITED STATES PATENT NOS. 6,297,771, 6,757,324, AND 6,933,886 (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
December 9, 2011 Filing 46 BRIEF filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc. OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF (Attachments: #1 Declaration DECLARATION OF BRIAN A.E. SMITH IN SUPPORT OF DEFENDANT BANDSPEED, INC.'S OPENING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF, #2 Exhibit 1 - Parties' Agreed Upon Claim Constructions, #3 Exhibit 2 - "GPS explained: Transmitted GPS Signals", #4 Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,297,771, #5 Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,933,886, #6 Exhibit 5 - U.S. Patent No. 6,757,324, #7 Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 6,577,271, #8 Exhibit 7 - Excerpted pages of the '271 patent prosecution file history, #9 Exhibit 8 - Excerpted pages of the '271 patent reexamination file history, #10 Exhibit 9 - Chart comparing '771 and '271 patent claims, #11 Exhibit 10 - "Trimble -- GPS Tutorial", #12 Exhibit 11 - "Trimble -- GPS Tutorial Error Correction", #13 Exhibit 12 - Excerpted pages of Novell's Encyclopedia of Networking (1997), #14 Exhibit 13 - Excerpted pages of IEEE 100 The Authoritative Dictionary of IEEE Standards Terms (7th ed. 2000), #15 Exhibit 14 - Excerpted pages from IEEE Standard Dictionary of elecrtrical and Electronics Terms (4th ed. 1988))(Smith, Brian)
November 22, 2011 Filing 45 STATEMENT JOINT CLAIM CONSTRUCTION AND PRE-HEARING STATEMENT filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
October 21, 2011 Filing 44 NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 8/15/11 11:00 a.m. (Montero, Bridget)
October 21, 2011 Filing 43 TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 8/15/11 11:00 a.m. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Bridget Montero, phone number www.bridgetmontero.com. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter, www.bridgetmontero.com, or PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 11/11/2011. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 11/21/2011. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 1/19/2012. (Montero, Bridget)
August 22, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER granting Stipulation to Reschedule #41 by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the schedule for claim construction briefing and exchange of claim terms shall be set as follows: Claim Construction Hearing - January 9, 2012; No reply claim construction briefs without leave of court - None; Parties File Simultaneous Responsive Claim Construction Briefs - December 22, 2011; Parties File Simultaneous Opening Claim Construction Briefs - December 9, 2011; Joint Claim Construction Statement (content required is identical to content required in N.D. Cal. Patent Local Rules 4.3(a) and (b)) - November 22, 2011; Exchange Proposed Constructions (content required is identical to content required in N.D. Cal. Patent Local Rules 4.2(a) and (b)) - November 10, 2011; and Exchange Claim Terms for Construction - October 27, 2011. (lom)
August 19, 2011 Filing 41 Joint STIPULATION to Reschedule Claim Construction Briefing Schedule filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
August 15, 2011 Filing 40 MINUTES OF CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE held before Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. The Court sets a claim construction hearing in this matter for Monday, January 9, 2012 at 10:00 A.M. The parties may seek construction of no more than ten claim terms. The parties are ORDERED to file a stipulated schedule no later than Friday, August 19, 2011. Court Reporter: Bridget Montero. (lom)
August 12, 2011 Filing 39 Plaintiff's Response in Compliance re: Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held,,, #36 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit FILE HISTORY TO US PATENT 6,933,886, #2 Exhibit FILE HISTORY TO US PATENT 6,757,324, #3 Exhibit FILE HISTORY TO US PATENT 6,297,771 - Part 1, #4 Exhibit FILE HISTORY TO US PATENT 6,297,771 - Part 2)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
August 9, 2011 Filing 38 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Matthew Franklin Greinert on behalf of Defendant Bandspeed Inc (Greinert, Matthew)
August 8, 2011 Filing 37 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 10 days, filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc.. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
August 5, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 36 MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: The Court orders Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. to file with the Court the file history for United States Patent Nos. 6,933,886; 6,297,771; and 6, 757,324 on or before Friday, August 12, 2011. Plaintiff should submit the file history in a 3-ring binder with a table of contents listing each of the documents, should place the documents in chronological order, mark each document with a tab. This paper copy of the file history need not include prior art references if the inclusion of those references would cause the copy to be unreasonably large. In addition to the paper copy, Plaintiff should submit an electronic copy in an appropriate electronic medium (e.g. CD-ROM or DVD). Each file history should be a separate electronic file and should be in PDF format. (ys)
August 1, 2011 Filing 35 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT (Amended) filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc identifying CSR Technology Holdings, CSR plc as Corporate Parent. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
July 19, 2011 Filing 34 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Brian A E Smith on behalf of Defendant Bandspeed Inc (Smith, Brian)
June 30, 2011 Filing 33 MINUTES IN CHAMBERS by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b), an Initial Case Management Conference is set in this matter for Monday, August 15, 2011, at 11:00 A.M. The parties are reminded of their obligations to disclose information, confer on a discovery plan, and report to the Court, as required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. Trial counsel are ORDERED to be present. When the parties confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26, the parties shall additionally discuss and address in the Case Management Statement filed pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 and the Local Rules of this Court. (See attached document for deadline requirements.) (lom)
June 24, 2011 Filing 32 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney John D Antoni on behalf of Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc (Antoni, John)
June 24, 2011 Filing 31 NOTICE of Association of Counsel associating attorney John D. Antoni on behalf of Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. Filed by Counter Defendant CSR Technology Inc, Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
June 2, 2011 Filing 30 CSR Technology Inc.'s ANSWER to Answer to Complaint (Discovery), Counterclaim #29 filed by plaintiff CSR Technology Inc.(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
May 27, 2011 Filing 29 ANSWER to Complaint #1 AND COUNTERCLAIM; Demand for Jury Trial against CSR Technology Inc filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc. (lom) (lom).
May 27, 2011 Filing 28 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Answer to Complaint (Discovery) #26 . The following error(s) was found: L.R. 3-2* Filing of Initiating Documents. Complaints (including counter-claims, cross-claims, etc.) and other initiating documents in civil cases shall be filed, in the traditional manner on paper rather than electronically. Please manually file. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. (lom)
May 27, 2011 Filing 27 Disclosure Statement and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc, identifying Interested Parties. (Bunsow, Henry)
May 27, 2011 Filing 26 ANSWER to Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) #1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc.(Bunsow, Henry) Modified on 5/31/2011 (lom). (See manually filed document no. 29)
April 26, 2011 Filing 25 FIRST STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Bandspeed Inc answer now due 5/27/2011, filed by Defendant Bandspeed Inc.(Bunsow, Henry)
April 15, 2011 Filing 24 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re APPLICATION for attorney Henry B. Gutman to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442088 paid.) #10 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting #10 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Henry B. Gutman on behalf of CSR Technology Inc., designating Jeffrey E. Ostrow as local counsel. (lt)
April 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting #11 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Kerry L. Konrad on behalf of CSR Technology Inc., designating Jeffrey E. Ostrow as local counsel. (lt)
April 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 21 ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting #8 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Gregory T. Chuebon on behalf of CSR Technology Inc., designating Jeffrey E. Ostrow as local counsel. (lt)
April 13, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 20 ORDER by Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer: granting #9 Application to Appear Pro Hac Vice by Attorney Victor Cole on behalf of CSR Technology Inc., designating Jeffrey E. Ostrow as local counsel. (lt)
April 11, 2011 Filing 19 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re APPLICATION for attorney Victor Cole to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442039 paid.) #9 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 11, 2011 Filing 18 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re APPLICATION for attorney Kerry Konrad to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442148 paid.) #11 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Pro Hac Vice Application)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 11, 2011 Filing 17 NOTICE OF LODGING filed re APPLICATION for attorney Gregory T. Chuebon to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8441236 paid.) #8 (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Certificate of Good Standing, #2 Proposed Order Proposed Order Granting Ex Parte Application)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 7, 2011 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER TRANSFERRING CIVIL ACTION pursuant to Section 3.1 of General Order 08-05. ORDER case transferred from Judge David O. Carter to the calendar of Judge Mariana R. Pfaelzer for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge SACV11-00494 MRP (MLGx). Signed by Judge David O. Carter. (ade)
April 6, 2011 Filing 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc, upon Defendant Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon John Doe (refused name), Vice President of Engineering in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 6, 2011 Filing 14 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc, upon Defendant Bandspeed Inc served on 4/6/2011, answer due 4/27/2011. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Salli Saunders, Managing Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity. Original Summons NOT returned. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 4, 2011 Filing 13 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: APPLICATION for attorney Victor Cole to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442039 paid.) #9 , APPLICATION for attorney Kerry Konrad to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442148 paid.) #11 , APPLICATION for attorney Gregory T. Chuebon to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8441236 paid.) #8 , APPLICATION for attorney Henry B. Gutman to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442088 paid.) #10 . The following error(s) was found: A Certification of Good Standing is not attached to Pro Hac Vice Application. Other error(s) with document(s): A separate Proposed Order was not submitted as a separate attachment to the Applications of Gregory T. Chuebon and Kerry Konrad. In response to this notice the court may order (1) an amended or correct document to be filed (2) the document stricken or (3) take other action as the court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the court directs you to do so. (vh)
April 1, 2011 Filing 12 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Jeffrey E Ostrow on behalf of Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 1, 2011 Filing 11 APPLICATION for attorney Kerry Konrad to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442148 paid.) filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 1, 2011 Filing 10 APPLICATION for attorney Henry B. Gutman to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442088 paid.) filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 1, 2011 Filing 9 APPLICATION for attorney Victor Cole to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8442039 paid.) filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 1, 2011 Filing 8 APPLICATION for attorney Gregory T. Chuebon to Appear Pro Hac Vice(PHV Fee of $275 receipt number 0973-8441236 paid.) filed by plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Ostrow, Jeffrey)
April 1, 2011 Filing 7 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application emailed and mailed to Victor cole for Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 G-64 Application, #2 G-64 Proposed Order) (lwag)
April 1, 2011 Filing 6 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application emailed and mailed to Kerry L. Konrad for Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 G-64 Application, #2 G-64 Proposed Order) (lwag)
April 1, 2011 Filing 5 NOTICE OF FILING FEE DUE on Pro Hac Vice Application emailed and mailed to Henry B. Gutman for Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (Attachments: #1 G-64 Application, #2 G-64 Proposed Order) (lwag)
April 1, 2011 Filing 4 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF ADR PROGRAM filed.(lwag)
April 1, 2011 Filing 3 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by CSR Technology Inc. (lwag)
April 1, 2011 Filing 2 DISCLOSURE STATEMENT and Notice of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc. (lwag)
April 1, 2011 Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Defendant Bandspeed Inc. Case assigned to Judge David O. Carter for all further proceedings. Discovery referred to Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman.(Filing fee $ 350 Paid). Jury Demanded. Filed by Plaintiff CSR Technology Inc.(lwag)
April 1, 2011 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint - (Discovery), Complaint - (Discovery) #1 as to Defendant Bandspeed Inc. (lwag)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: CSR Technology Inc v. Bandspeed Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: CSR Technology Inc
Represented By: Jeffrey E Ostrow
Represented By: Jonathan C Sanders
Represented By: Kerry Konrad
Represented By: Michelle P Woodhouse
Represented By: Victor Cole
Represented By: Arun K Goel
Represented By: Colman D McCarthy
Represented By: Patrick E King
Represented By: Gregory T Chuebon
Represented By: Henry B Gutman
Represented By: John D. Antoni
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bandspeed Inc
Represented By: Brian A E Smith
Represented By: Matthew Franklin Greinert
Represented By: Henry Charles Bunsow
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?