Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company v. Emae International Corporation et al
| Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company |
| DOE, Emae International Corporation, Ehab Maher Maamoun, Pinnacle Surety Services Inc and American Contractors Indemnity Company |
| 8:2011cv00793 |
| May 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Cormac J. Carney |
| Marc L. Goldman |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
46
JUDGMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney, in favor of Construction Laborers Trust Funds for Southern California Administrative Company against Ehab Maher Maamoun in the principal amount of $12,000.00, interest in the amount of $0.00, attorneys fees of $0.00, costs of $0.00 for a total judgment of $12,000.00. (See document for further details.) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (rla)
|
|
Filing
42
IN CHAMBERS MINUTE ORDER DISMISSING ACTION ON NOTICE OF SETTLEMENT by Judge Cormac J. Carney: The Court, having been advised by counsel for Plaintiff that this action has been settled in the Notice of Settlement filed on May 16, 2012 41 , hereby orders this action dismissed without prejudice. The Court hereby orders all proceedings in the case vacated and taken off calendar. (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (mu)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
