Cheryl Lynn Alexander v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America et al
| Cheryl Lynn Alexander |
| KPMG LLP Staff Employees Short Term Disability and Long Term Disability Coverage Plan, The Prudential Insurance Company of America, DOES and KPMG LLP |
| 8:2011cv00798 |
| May 24, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| David O. Carter |
| Arthur Nakazato |
| Labor: E.R.I.S.A. |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER DISMISSING CIVIL ACTION by Judge David O. Carter, The Court having been advised by counsel for the parties that the above-entitled action has been settled; IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action is dismissed without prejudice to the right, upon good cause shown within 30 days, to reopen this action if settlement is not consummated. Case Terminated. Made JS-6. (rla)
|
|
Filing
3
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE re Jurisdiction by Judge David O. Carter: Best Buy is ordered to file an amended initial pleading within 15 days identifying each member of the LP and the member's citizenship and principal place of business as the date of the filing of the initial pleading. If any member is itself an LP or a limited liability company, the same information shall be provided for each subtier member, and if need be, for each successive subtier. A failure to respond may result in remand of the case to the Superior Court of the State of California for lack of jurisdiction. (rla)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
