IP Power Holdings Limited v. Bam Brokerage Inc et al
| IP Power Holdings Limited |
| Does and Bam Brokerage Inc |
| 8:2011cv01234 |
| August 17, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Arthur Nakazato |
| James V. Selna |
| Patent |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
81
JUDGMENT by Judge James V. Selna, in favor of IP Power Holdings Limited against Bam Brokerage Inc. Plaintiff IP Power Holdings Limited Ltd. shall recover compensatory damages in the amount of $30,229.73; Plaintiff IP Power Holdings Limited Ltd. shall recover costs incurred in the amount of $2,238; (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
|
|
Filing
63
AMENDED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. This Protective Order is issued to facilitate document disclosure and production under the Local Rules of this Court and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (See Order for details) 58 61 , 62 (bem)
|
|
Filing
45
MINUTES (IN CHAMBERS) Re: Order to Show Cause to Defendant by Judge James V. Selna. The Court ORDERS the defendant, BAM Brokerages, Inc., to SHOW CAUSE, in writing, not later than October 25, why the answer should not bestricken and default entered and/or sanctions imposed for failure to comply with the Courts Order of June 20, 2013 requiring an appearance of new counsel within 30 days. The Court will accept a filed Notice of Appearance of new counsel as an adequate response to this Order to Show Cause. (dro)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
