Veth Mam v. City of Fullerton et al
Veth Mam |
Michael Sellers, Daniel Solorio, Doe Reynoso, Frank Nguyen, City of Fullerton, Does, Kenton Hampton and Jonathan W Miller |
8:2011cv01242 |
August 19, 2011 |
US District Court for the Central District of California |
Marc L. Goldman |
Josephine Staton Tucker |
Civil Rights: Other |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 327 ORDER by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker: denying 323 Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law ; denying 323 Motion for New Trial. (twdb) |
Filing 318 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker. (See Order for details) (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (db) |
Filing 256 ORDER by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker: GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT OFFICER KENTON HAMPTON'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (Doc. 72): (See document for details.) For the reasons set forth above the Court GRANTS Defendant's Motion as to the false arrest, malicious prosecution and conspiracy theories, but DENIES Defendant's Motion as to the First Amendment retaliation and excessive force theories. (rla) |
Filing 36 ORDER by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker: Granting In part and Denying In Part Defendants' Motions to Dismiss (docs. 7,9), and Denying Defendants' Motion for A More Definite Statement(9); Plaintiff may file an amended complaint consistent with this Order no later than March 5, 2012. RE: 7 9 (twdb) |
Filing 35 PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Marc L. Goldman re Notice (Other) 34 (twdb) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.