Acacia Inc v. Neomed Inc
Plaintiff: Acacia Inc
Defendant: Neomed Inc
Case Number: 8:2011cv01329
Filed: September 1, 2011
Court: US District Court for the Central District of California
Presiding Judge: Arthur Nakazato
Presiding Judge: Josephine Staton Tucker
Nature of Suit: Trademark

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
October 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 74 JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, in favor of Acacia Inc against Neomed Inc, Related to: Stipulation for Judgment 73 . (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
July 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 52 ORDER by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker: granting 39 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The USPTO is directed to cancel U.S. Trademark Registration No.3,478,363. (twdb)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Acacia Inc v. Neomed Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Neomed Inc
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Acacia Inc
Represented By: Peter M Shimamoto
Represented By: Keith J Wesley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?