Yan Sui et al v. 2176 Pacific Homeowners Association et al
| Yan Sui and Pei-Yu Yang |
| 2176 Pacific Homeowners Association, Does and Stephen D Price |
| 8:2011cv01340 |
| September 6, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| John A Kronstadt |
| Andrew J. Wistrich |
| Civil Rights: Other |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
116
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS by Judge John A. Kronstadt for Report and Recommendation (Issued), 113 . See document for details. (yb)
|
|
Filing
51
JUDGMENT by Judge John A Kronstadt, Related to: R&R - Accepting Report and Recommendations, 50 . IT IS ADJUDGED that plaintiffs state law claims under California Consumer Credit Reporting Agencies Act, Cal. Civ. Code §§ 1785 et seq., are dismissed without prejudice, and plaintiffs federal claims are dismissed with prejudice. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (mz)
|
|
Filing
39
MINUTE ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE REGARDING DISMISSAL by Magistrate Judge Andrew J. Wistrich. No later than Friday, June 15, 2012, plaintiffs (or the Trustee, if he wishes to appear) are ordered to show cause why this action should not be dismissed without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction by filing a declaration under penalty of perjury with or without attached exhibits. Exhibits that are not properly authenticated will not be considered. IT IS SO ORDERED. (mz)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
