Securities and Exchange Commission v. Jeff Greeney et al
| Securities and Exchange Commission |
| Big Baller Media Group LLC and Jeff Greeney |
| 8:2011cv01467 |
| September 22, 2011 |
| US District Court for the Central District of California |
| Robert N. Block |
| Josephine Staton Tucker |
| Securities/Commodities |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
10
AMENDMENT TO FINAL JUDGMENT AS TO DEFENDANTS Jeff Greeney and Big Baller Media Group, LLC by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker. Accordingly, the hearing set for January 23, 2012 at 10:00 a.m. is VACATED RE 6 . IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREE D that Defendants Jeff Greeney and Big Baller Media Group, LLC are liable, jointly and severally, for disgorgement of $331,615, representing profits gained as a result of the conduct alleged in the Complaint, together with prejudgment interest thereon in the amount of $67,842, covering the period of August 22, 2007 through January 23, 2012. See Order for more information. (twdb)
|
|
Filing
5
JUDGMENT by Judge Josephine Staton Tucker, in favor of Securities and Exchange Commission against Big Baller Media Group LLC. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED, AND DECREED that this Court shall retain jurisdiction of this matter for the purposes of enforcing the terms of this Judgment. Related to: Notice (Other) 2 (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (twdb)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Central District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
